Building Our Movement:
Democratic Internal Process Toolkit
Why Democratic Internal Process is important to JDM
JDM will flourish when the individuals involved in JDM member organizations are actively engaged. This engagement should start with the decision to join JDM! Involving as many as people as possible in that decision sets a culture and an expectation for participation in all the JDM activities that follow, should an organization decide to join. Being brought into decisionmaking gives everyone a sense of ownership over the project and investment in it. We’ve all been in situations where our opinions haven’t been sought or valued and we know how disempowering that can feel.
JDM will flourish when the tensions inherent in our work are brought to the surface. We want to create a culture where diverse opinions can be celebrated and can inform our making decisions that work for as many people as possible.
JDM will flourish as more Jews are drawn away from the mainstream Jewish establishment and towards our member organizations. The Jewish establishment claims to speak for all American Jews, while in reality their decisions are driven by a tiny group of top leaders and major donors. In order to draw more Jews towards us, we need to practice what we preach and provide spaces where the voices of those Jews are truly heard and celebrated. We hope to help build consensus around the importance of transparency and participation throughout our movement.
Who is this for?
If you already have a clear internal process for collective decision making, more power to you! We’d love to hear about how it’s going.
If not, below are some basic tools that might help.
Types of Decision Making Overview
1. Hierarchical (whoever is in charge decides)
single leader
leadership group (using any of the methods below)
2. Voting
a. options for thresholds to pass:
majority voting: 51%
supermajority voting: 60%, 75%, or whatever your group prefers
b. options for process:
say yea or nay
show of hands
thumbs up in digital meeting platform
paper ballots
digital ballots
simple polling software (googleform, etc.)
instant run-off (free platforms such as https://rankpoll.me/)
3. Consensus
Full consensus (“do you agree”)
Consensus minus 1 (or 2 or more depending on the size of the group)
Sociocratic Consent (“do you object”)
Some options for the JDM decision
Advisory or Binding Poll: An online (or paper) form offering your members a chance to give feedback and indicate whether they want to join JDM.
Some best practices for successful polling include:
be clear about whether the poll will be the way the group makes the decision or will be used to inform the decision made by a leadership group (or individual leader)
decide ahead of time what threshold is needed for a binding vote to pass
Questions could include:
(Link to structure document and FAQ)
Do you think we would benefit from joining JDM?
Do you think JDM would benefit from having our experiences and wisdom?
What concerns do you have about joining JDM?
If we join, would you be interested in joining a JDM committee and if so which one(s)?
If the group decides to proceed with joining JDM, figure out who will be the official liaison to JDM and have them fill out the covenant form.
Meeting/Discussion: An in-person or virtual meeting for discussing and/or deciding the issue
Discussing Without Deciding: Sample Advisory Meeting Agenda
Sociocratic Decision-Making: Sample Sociocratic Meeting Agenda
Voting to Decide: Sample Voting Meeting Agenda